what I found interesting:
- the fact that the issues were different as compared to those at home, but still the same. Here it is not as obvious a water scarcity, but they still have increasing demands and reducing flows.
- 70 people turned out for the meeting, out of a population of 1800. most of the people i spoke to (cab driver, hotelier) did not know of the meeting. Of the people who did turn up, most were 'regulars'. people who had been with this always. And yet, it was considered an extremely good turnout.
- Though the actors were different it was interesting to see that the roles were being fulfilled. instead of sugarcane farmers, there are real estate developers, instead of threatened sarpanches, there are tribal governments, so on and so forth.
- There has been put into place a system for operationalising this public participation through the creation of 'an initial governing system' and so on. It seems to me that this is something that can be applied in the Bhima. But here, it is the department of ecology that is leading the issue, and it is backed by the water law. What is the equivalent in India? The nearest thing I have seen is the 'executive committee' in Aurangabad, and that worked quite well. can we upscale that? how to get govt.